You could use the title for almost any story about reverses affecting Los Angeles’ economy, but this one happens to be about LAX. According to LA Biz Observed blogger Mark Lacter, and the Daily Breeze, LAX is facing losses in its lucrative overseas business, business that has a largely unseen positive effect on the Los Angeles economy. It’s so unseen that City Hall has utterly mismanaged the needed upgrades at LAX for the past 15 years, preferring to listen to NIMBY-minded voters than the economists, labor leaders and airline executives who kept telling them LAX’s huge advantage in international flights was not God-given, and that the airport needed some major fixes or the airlines would go elsewhere.
Sure, Air India’s decision to stop flying out of Los Angeles could be blamed on high fuel prices. That alibi was already claimed by the Department of World Airports chief executive. But Air India still flies out of San Francisco, and fuel costs just as much up there.
The fact that you could reach dozens of cities overseas via nonstop flights from LAX gave this region an enormous edge economically. But the locals didn’t care much about that and it was easy and more beneficial to make LAX and its stewards a target for political posturing. And eventually, much easier for those stewards to tell the city council whatever nonsense it wants to hear. It’s not their airport. It’s Los Angeles’.
This is the problem with term limits. The idea was to force the politicians to focus on their responsibilities as elected officials and not on their electoral fortunes. This part of term limits has failed. The politicians are much less connected to the city they serve than they were in the days of John Ferraro and Gilbert Lindsey. In Los Angeles, you now have a political culture built around tearing down city assets rather than protecting them, because having a few notches in your belt positions you for the next campaign. So what if a critical institution like LAX is weakened? That’s a trivial concern to the city’s political leadership now.
P.S. Bill Boyarsky has a post explaining what council members really think about when they think about LAX.