From the Desert to the Sea…

Entries categorized as ‘Music & Performing Arts’

Standing on the Shoulders that Stood on the Shoulders of Giants

Friday, June 2, 2006 · Leave a Comment

I've been listening avidly to a CD from 2004, A.C. Newman's The Slow Wonder. Newman writes about 75 percent of the songs on the New Pornographers' disks, including vehicles like "Bones of an Idol" and "Laws Have Changed" for that wondrous chanteuse, Neko Case. Newman's style is unmistakable, but he never repeats himself. That, to me, is the sign of a timeless pop talent.

AC Newman.jpgListening to Newman, you can pick up some of his influences, especially Brian Wilson, Phil Spector, Burt Bacharach and Paul McCartney. Like his mentors' best music, Newman's songs are light and enjoyable on the surface, but the melodies are laid over a structure of complex harmonies, driving beats and odd arrangements that recall Wilson's masterpiece, Pet Sounds.

The difference is that each of Newman's major influences were, themselves, the products of the music that came before them. Brian Wilson listened to Chuck Berry and the Four Freshman. Newman was born two years after Pet Sounds came out. McCartney listened to English music-hall tunes and Little Richard. Newman was born the year "Hey Jude" was released. Bacharach worshipped Dizzy Gillespie and studied under French orchestral composer Darius Milhaud. These writers built some of the greatest pop music ever heard by synthesizing distinct, even incongruent strains of authentic, music never intended for wide audiences.

American/British pop music is omniverous. Over the years it has absorbed all sorts of folk traditions, adopting sounds second- and third-hand, then going abroad to find more untainted sources to borrow. By now, if there is a unique sound anywhere in the world that hasn't been incorporated into a pop or dance tune, extremely shy people must be making it. That makes today an extremely challenging time for pop music writers. The rise of a talent like A.C. Newman proves there is room for originality, but he will never have the luxury of melding his style with something no one's heard before.

This is all a long prologue to writing a few words about my son. One of my readers asked me to go back to a topic I've written about once – my 15-year-old son's artistic pursuits. So here goes.

Since he was very young, this boy has gone from obsession to obsession, and these obsessions have been the source — the only source, really — of his creativity. The interesting problem for me, as a parent, is what happens when my son is not obsessed.

He started with a pen, drawing with what I thought was prodigious skill during his first 12 or 13 years. But he refused to take an art lesson. He knew what he wanted to draw–Disney characters, and sometimes characters of his own. He figured out how to draw them, and worked very hard at it. "You need art lessons. You need to learn shading," I'd admonish him. A few days later, he'd show me another drawing, this one with shading. "Your drawings are two-dimensional, we should get you an art class to learn to show dimension." Within days, he had figured out dimension. Anything to avoid art lessons.

Eventually he moved his drawings into the computer. He learned how to use Flash and then other animation programs. He still takes digital animation classes in school, where he is a source of frustration to his teacher, as he gives himself more difficult assignments than she gives him–and then can't finish them.

Over the past year, his interests shifted to drama, particularly musical theater. He got cast in one musical, then another, and now he's in another. Animation, the dream of his young life, took second place. Then third place. For years, he's had a little electric piano in his room. He had taken piano lessons years ago, but I stopped them when it was apparent he would never practice. I was never sure he even learned to read music.

Now, he's trying to write his own musicals. Strange stories about murder and neglected children, with ominous, dissonant songs that he's writing on a keyboard I didn't realize he knew how to play; digging into an old rhyming dictionary to help with the lyrics; using his animation programs' audio features to record multi-tracked vocal harmonies. My wife and I frequently will be sitting in bed late at night, suddenly aware of these spooky sounds — like bees stuck in molasses — coming from next door. It's the artist at work.

sondheim.jpgMy son's latest inspiration is Stephen Sondheim, lyricist for West Side Story, and composer/lyricist of a string of challenging, highly original shows like Sunday in the Park with George, A Little Night Music, and Into the Woods. Sondheim — like Brian Wilson, like Burt Bacharach, is a writer who created something by blending traditions. He was taught first by Oscar Hammerstein II, composer of classic shows like Oklahoma!, Carousel and South Pacific, then by Milton Babbit, whose claim to fame is a body of atonal and electronic works in the 12-tone style pioneered by Arnold Schoenberg. Many of Sondheim's musicals express the duality of his influences. He is steeped in the emotions, the staginess, the razz-ma-tazz of Broadway, but ofttimes his songs are dark, bleak and tuneless. Sweeney Todd, his greatest work, is about a murderous, avenging barber and the woman who bakes pies out of the resulting corpses. There are beautiful love songs in this show, but the melodies reflect the madness and blood-lust of the hero and heroine.

My son has memorized many of Sondheim's songs, and sings along with them on his mp3 player while he's doing his homework. He's familiar with other recent shows by newer composers, like Urinetown, Avenue Q, Rent, Wicked, and of course the Disney movie musicals — but he asked me the other day whether Carousel was any good. To my son, the shows that comment on, satirize, steal or upend the canon of musicals from Broadway's golden age are the canon. The classics — he admires the ones he's heard, but he feels no urgency about learning from them.

Just as A.C. Newman, asked about the influences on the New Pornographers, said this (emphasis mine):

“Various unintentional influences have crept into our work, some of which are quickly removed: The Moody Blues, Tubeway Army, Wings, always Wings, never The Beatles, Eno of course, you can’t play ebow without sounding like Eno, Modern English, middle period post-Gabriel Genesis, The Stranglers, the vocal inflections on “Dreadlock Holiday” remain a steady influence, we’re still trying to find a way to insert some dub/white reggae in the mix, just as an intellectual exercise, to see if we can do it without being dropped from the label. I know it sounds awful but it will all work out.”

To music fans of my generation, anyone who prefers Wings to the Beatles is demonstrably insane (and Newman is at least half-joking). But then, I wasn't born in 1968. Likewise, it makes perfect sense for my son to see Stephen Sondheim as Square One, and to hear his once-controversial music not as the end of musical evolution, but as the starting point. To an artist with fresh eyes and ears, any point can be a starting point.

When my son takes his creations out into the world, he'll face stiff competition from people who gave themselves over to their teachers more, who know more, and who have made the sacrifices needed to develop basic techniques that he skipped over. He knows that, but so far, he hasn't changed course. The obsessed might be maddening at times, but they've got a kind of integrity, and from where I sit, a few feet from his bedroom door, it's amazing to watch it play out.

Categories: 1960's · About Me · Baby Boomers · Music · Music & Performing Arts · Parenting · mp3

“Bring on the lovers, liars and clowns!”

Monday, April 17, 2006 · 1 Comment

For me, April 2006 has been a month of extreme darkness and extreme light, a time when one could attest to the worst suspicions about the nature of humanity — or the brightest vision of it.

Part of my problem in life, perhaps, is a temperamental refusal to see the worst in people. In high school, my smart-ass comments earned me the title of Cynic. In response, I spent the next 30 years of my life trying not to be one — maybe to a fault.

Nevertheless, my "always look on the bright side of life" mentality lets me be joyful when joy is called for. And joy was clearly called for last Friday night when I watched my son perform opening night of his high school's production of "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum," the 1962 Stephen Sondheim musical.

We had 15 members of my family in the audience, many of them visiting for Easter. The auditorium was loaded with friends of cast members, friends who cheer insanely when said cast member first appears, and then again when they take their curtain call. My son had more than a few girls screaming for him, like he was a Beatle.

He first opens his mouth when he sings a line or two in the show's first and most famous song, "Comedy Tonight." It was a startling moment: When did he become a baritone? Does it have anything to do with the sudden sprout of dark hair above his lips?

He has one big number, fairly early in the show. The show is a bit risque (although compared to what kids can see on cable TV after school, it's chaste). His song has more than its share of suggestive lines, which is not too surprising, since he's a brothel-keeper introducing his flock. But I wasn't expecting him to be so lecherously funny. In real life, my son is rather chivalrous and would never say such things, but onstage, he was way too convincing. Maybe he has a secret side.

What am I saying, of course he has a secret side!

At the end of the show, of course, I'm in tears. Not just proud of my son, I'm proud of everyone on the stage, and grateful that they have such a marvelous director/teacher who has given each of them exactly what they need to succeed when the spotlight goes on. This is a cast of kids who trust each other, and trust that if they work hard and do what their teacher tells them, the audience will love them.

Teachers are no longer given automatic respect anywhere in society — not from kids, not from parents, not from government. When Hillary Clinton wrote "it takes a village to raise a child," her advocacy for teachers and other social support systems had the perverse backlash effect of elevating the role of parents as the sole appropriate source for childhood instruction and character development. But I look at my son's drama teacher as a critical partner in raising him right now. She has taught him the values of responsibility, teamwork and being prepared far more effectively than I have managed to do so far.

At the end of the show, I gather with much of the audience outside the doors from which the actors will emerge. I've gotten used to sharing him with his friends and fans. He hugs his fellow actors. He hugs his cheering section. Someone gives him flowers. Finally, he catches my eye, comes over and hugs me — but just for a nanosecond. In high school, you're barely supposed to acknowledge that you even have parents. He's a bit more demonstrative with the 14 other family members who've come to see him. He is clearly elated. He worried about the show all week, but he knows the cast did a good job because he heard us laughing. If you're onstage in a comedy, you measure every laugh.

My wife and I hang around for a few minutes, watching the hug-fest. Eventually, the cast and many of their friends will go off to a cast party. I'm sure it was a celebration, although, of course, he tells me nothing of what went on there.

The big, tuneful opening number has been running through my head all weekend. This could pass for my credo:

Nothing with kings, nothing with crowns;
Bring on the lovers, liars and clowns!

Old situations,
New complications,
Nothing portentous or polite;
Tragedy tomorrow,
Comedy tonight!

Categories: About Me · Education · Music & Performing Arts · Parenting

Rough Ride for Smooth Jazz

Sunday, April 9, 2006 · 13 Comments

There is hardly a genre of music I can't say something good about. Every style of music has its resident genius. Maybe all the imitators, the ones cashing in, are terrible. But somewhere, either at the root of a style, or off on an eccentric branch, I think a music fan can find performances and compositions that can change your ears, and the stuff between them.

That said, I can barely tolerate the style now known as "smooth jazz." The term itself strikes me as obscene. Jazz is a provocative art form. You listen to Louis Armstrong even now, you hear someone chasing the limits of freedom, unfettered and unruly. Everyone who followed from Armstrong — Duke Ellington, Benny Goodman, Dizzy Gillespie, Miles Davis, Bud Powell, Bill Evans, John Coltrane, Horace Silver, dozens of others — sure, they could be cool, but they were never smooth.

Jazz is meant to be noticed. "Smooth jazz" is meant not to be. It has more in common with the Wyndham Hill style — soundscapes for relaxation and meditation, with no edges to snag your coat.

You don't often run into well-written essays in defense of "smooth jazz," so when I ran across this link on ArtsJournal, I figured I should give the writer, respected music critic J.D. Considine, a chance to enlighten me:

Nearly everyone knows the cliché version of the smooth sound. There's a soprano sax playing a melody line, a synthesized electric piano filling in the harmony, and a gently funky groove laid down by six-string bass guitar and drums. It's a formula familiar to anyone who has ever been put on hold, ridden in an elevator or tuned into the Weather Network for the local forecast.

Saxophonist Kenny G — who doesn't, by the way, consider his music jazz –is generally credited with having established that template, but radio stations and record companies generally get the blame for its having come to define the genre.

"Even if one is thinking about elevator music, or Weather Channel music, there isn't any necessity for that music to be bad music," says Bob James. "I remind people all the time that Mozart would probably sound great in an elevator. A lot of Mozart is very smooth to our ears, but that doesn't mean there isn't an amazing amount of subtlety there for the listener who digs deeper."

The problem, as he sees it, is that marketers and business people have tried to reduce the creative process to a commercial formula, which gets imposed on music and musicians. "The best example in our genre is when the guidelines given for what would be a commercially viable smooth-jazz recording — one they could guarantee would get played on smooth-jazz radio –would be a recording that doesn't have any solos in it," he says. "They've either been edited out or cut back so far that it's what the formula has demanded, a melody that repeats over and over again, with a funky rhythm in the background.

Hmm. Mozart would sound good in an elevator. But that doesn't mean all elevator music merits comparison to Mozart. And it sounds like Bob James is aware that his chosen genre has been contaminated by the crassest of commercial considerations. I'd like to see what would've happened if a music consultant tried to give "guidelines" to Miles Davis. A broken nose would have been the likely outcome.

As much as Considine's piece is worth reading, I do object to some of the artists he associates with "smooth jazz." There's a lot more going on in Norah Jones' music than would fit any specific genre, least of all "smooth jazz." Pat Matheny developed a weirdly narcotized tone for his guitar, but he's a thrilling soloist, and was a pioneer.

Considine avoids one obvious word: Sex. Let's face it, for most fans, "smooth jazz" is optimal music for trysts. But then…so is Mozart.

Categories: About Me · Music · Music & Performing Arts · jazz